odd_buttons: (eats)
odd_buttons ([personal profile] odd_buttons) wrote2004-12-15 09:57 am

Roman à Clef

Does this concept define real person slash in any way, shape, or form? I'm honestly curious.

*

The following is an excerpt from Part III of the book Making Shapely Fiction, by Jerome Stern. The first two parts are very much worth reading as well. The book is available in paperback.



Roman à Clef

This term refers to a novel based on the lives of real people, but the names or other superficial details have been changed. If readers know the real-life situation, they have the key, so to speak (clef is "key" in French; roman means "novel"). Then they can tell who is supposed to be whom.

A true roman à clef might be a fictionalized but fairly accurate account. Aldous Huxley's Point Counter Point includes characters who are closely based on D. H. Lawrence and John Middleton Murry. In On the Road Jack Kerouac's characters resemble himself, Neal Cassady, William Burroughs, Allen Ginsberg, and other friends. A variant of the form (which perhaps should be called a "false roman à clef") implies that it is based on the lives of real people, but is, in fact, wildly fictionalized. Harold Robbins's The Carpetbaggers adapts incidents to create a specious resemblance to the lives of Howard Hughes and Jane Russell.

Many novels have characters that come from real life, and some novels are extremely autobiographical, but a roman à clef usually means that the entire novel is dominated by its appropriation of an identifiable set of publicly recognizable figures. If you have lived among interesting and famous people, a roman à clef is a way to recreate them as fictional characters. That allows you freedoms of interpretation and invention not available to conventional biographers. It also might involve you in complex lawsuits about exploitation of a person's "commercial value," libel, and invasion of privacy.

See Novel, Realism.

[identity profile] lullenny.livejournal.com 2004-12-17 01:43 am (UTC)(link)
Maybe different sides of the same coin? Or some multi-sided die?? You've given me decent food for thought - thanks.

"The acceptability of RPS . . . is very much debated" -- that would be the only thing about RPS that can't be argued, heh.